Lindsay Clancy’s lawyer asks judge to find her not guilty after mistrial

Defense attorney Kevin Reddington is asking a Massachusetts judge to step in and declare Lindsay Clancy not guilty by reason of insanity following a high profile trial that ended in a deadlock. The request comes just six days after Judge William Sullivan declared a mistrial in the case involving the mother who killed her three young children in early 2023. Reddington argues that the prosecution failed to prove that Clancy understood the wrongfulness of her actions, asserting that the evidence presented during the six week trial simply does not support a conviction for first degree murder.

The legal battle centers on whether Clancy suffered from postpartum psychosis at the time she strangled five year old Cora, three year old Dawson, and eight month old Callan. While Clancy admitted to the killings and subsequent suicide attempt that left her paralyzed, her defense maintains she lacked criminal responsibility. According to Reddington, even the experts called by the prosecution agreed that Clancy was suffering from a serious mental illness, suggesting that any ability she had to perform routine tasks did not equate to an understanding of right and wrong.

Adding tension to the proceedings are new revelations regarding the jury’s deliberations. After seven days of deadlock, one former juror spoke publicly about how a single holdout prevented a unanimous verdict. Reddington claims in his motion that eleven of the twelve jurors were actually prepared to find Clancy not guilty by reason of lack of criminal responsibility, but were blocked by one individual who refused to agree despite admitting they had reasonable doubt.

As prosecutors remain silent on whether they intend to pursue a retrial, the defense wants Judge Sullivan to resolve the matter himself rather than putting it back before another jury. Reddington contends that no rational jury could find beyond a reasonable doubt that Clancy was sane given the available proof. The court is expected to hear arguments on this motion during a scheduled hearing on September 29.

The Morning Brief

Markets move at 4am. You read about it at 7.

One email before the opening bell: what shifted overnight, which numbers matter today, and the analysis behind both. Written by our desk editors, not an algorithm.

6am
In your inbox, every trading day
5 min
The whole brief, start to finish
9 desks
Markets to policy, in one place
Free newsletter

Join the desk. One email, before the bell.

Free forever. No spam, no sharing, unsubscribe in one click.

Read by desk editors, analysts and independent investors.